The reference to "allocation questionnaire" has been changed to "directions questionnaire" in the section What is the procedure for applying for Summary Judgment?
Summary judgment is a procedure by which any of the parties or the court can dispose of all or part of a case without a trial where:
A claim or issue or a defence to a claim or issue has no real prospect of success.
There is no other compelling reason for a trial.
A defendant may obtain summary judgment against a claimant in any proceedings. However, claimants in certain proceedings may not be able to obtain summary judgment. (For further information, see Practice note, Summary judgment: an overview: Excluded proceedings (www.practicallaw.com/9-203-1180)).
The court can direct that an application for summary judgment be made (CPR 3.3(1) and (4)).
Summary judgment is available in Part 8 proceedings although the nature of such proceedings may mean that it is not necessary (see Practice note, Summary judgment: an overview: Part 8 proceedings (www.practicallaw.com/9-203-1180)).
In certain types of claims a claimant cannot obtain summary judgment against the defendant (CPR 24.3(2)).
If a defendant has challenged the jurisdiction of the court, a claimant should not make an application for summary judgment until the outstanding challenge is determined.
A summary judgment application could result in delay and costs. Until heard, proceedings are suspended for other purposes. Unsuccessful applications will likely lead to adverse costs orders against the applicant.
A court may not grant summary judgment if a defendant needs more time to investigate the claim or the case is highly complex. For further information, see Practice note, Summary judgment: an overview, The test the court will apply (www.practicallaw.com/9-203-1180).
Only in very exceptional cases will summary judgment be granted at trial (see Practice note, Summary judgment: an overview, When should summary judgment be considered? (www.practicallaw.com/9-203-1180))
CPR 24 governs summary judgment.
CPR 3.3(1) and (4) contain the power of the court to make an order of its own initiative.
CPR 1.4 sets out the court's duty to manage cases, which includes disposing of them summarily.
Note 6 to CPR 3.4 in the White Book (Civil Procedure, Vol 1 (Sweet & Maxwell, 2011)) deals with the interplay between striking out and summary judgment.
Claimants' applications: after acknowledgement of service or defence unless the court gives permission or a practice direction provides otherwise but there are exceptions to this rule (see PD 24).
Defendants' applications: at any time, but usually at the first Case Management Conference.
Summary judgment raised at the court's initiative: usually, it is raised at the first case management conference.
Part 8 Claim: an application for summary judgment should be made after acknowledgement of service. If no acknowledgement is served, permission is needed.
Evidence: the applicant's evidence should be filed and served with the application. The respondent should file and serve their evidence at least seven days before the hearing and the applicant can file and serve evidence in reply three days before the hearing. For further details, see Practice note, Summary judgment: an overview, Timing for service of application and for response and other evidence. (www.practicallaw.com/9-203-1180) For information on service and what it involves, see Practice note, Service of the claim form and other documents: an overview (www.practicallaw.com/3-382-5813). The same time frame applies to court instigated applications. If the court of its own initiative wishes to consider summary judgment, it will give the parties 14 days notice and fix a hearing.
Note that it is important to compute time correctly (CPR 2.8).
Application Form: N244 (www.practicallaw.com/8-205-6543). Applicants must state that the application is made under CPR 24.
Evidence: applicants must identify the point of law or document to be relied on and state the grounds for making the application in accordance with CPR 24.2.
(For examples, see Summary judgment and Strike out: Case study (www.practicallaw.com/8-205-4327)).
What to lodge at court: sufficient copies of application notice and evidence within time frame.
Serve application and evidence on respondent (for information on service, see Practice note, Service of the claim form and other documents: an overview (www.practicallaw.com/3-382-5813). Note: if costs are claimed (which is usual), the parties must serve costs schedules on each other 24 hours before the hearing (see (Practice note, Summary assessment (www.practicallaw.com/3-203-1183) and Standard document, Costs estimate or statement of costs: example (www.practicallaw.com/2-205-5396)).
Court hearing: the parties should exchange skeleton arguments and the claimant should prepare a court bundle (see Practice note, Summary judgment: an overview, Skeleton arguments and court bundles for the hearing (www.practicallaw.com/9-203-1180)).
Orders: these include summary judgment, striking out or dismissal of claim or defence, dismissal of application, conditional order, dismissal of application and further directions (see Practice note, Summary judgment: an overview, Orders the court might make on a summary judgment application (www.practicallaw.com/9-203-1180)).
For cases where the defence is received on or after 1 April 2013, to avoid allocation of a case prior to a summary judgment hearing (except in the Commercial or Technology and Construction Court where allocation to the multi- track is automatic), lodge the application before completing the directions questionnaire. State in the directions questionnaire that the application for summary judgment is lodged and request that allocation not take place prior to the hearing.
Comply with any relevant pre-action protocol or else a summary judgment application may not be entertained before a defence has been filed or the time for doing so has expired.
When preparing evidence in support of an application for summary judgment, be concise. Do not anticipate the respondent’s arguments. You will have an opportunity to reply.
Summary judgment applications should not be used as a mini trial of issues. Assess whether the legal and factual issues raised are complex and whether there are real and genuine issues of fact which ought to be tried.
Consider whether there are documents or facts known which might afford a complete or partial defence to the claim and which are disclosable at the trial stage. If so, summary judgment should not be sought.
Consider whether summary judgment is the most appropriate remedy or whether another alternative, such as strike out, should be used. If a case is hopeless, strike out may be more appropriate.