Prompt service of Particulars: a practical view from the Bar

In the first of a new regular monthly column, James Bickford Smith discusses recent decisions insisting on the need for prompt service of Particulars of Claim in cases where interim relief has been obtained. In particular, he considers the implications of Caterpillar Logistics Services (UK) Ltd v de Crean [2012] EWCA Civ 156 on the practice of extending, by agreement, procedural deadlines laid down in a court order.

James is a barrister at Littleton Chambers specialising in commercial and employment law.

James Bickford Smith, Littleton Chambers

Register for free access

To access this resource and thousands more, register for a free, no-obligation trial of Practical Law. Register using the button below, telephone +44 (0)20 7202 1220 or e-mail info@practicallaw.com.

A free trial will give you:

Unlimited access to Practical Law online know-how
Thousands of market standard documents and clauses
Daily alerts and weekly update e-mails on key legal developments in your practice area
 

Register

Log in

To access this resource, log in below or register for free access.

Contact us

Our customer services team are available every working day 8.30am to 7pm (GMT).

{ "siteName" : "PLC", "objType" : "PLC_Doc_C", "objID" : "1247614179575", "objName" : "Prompt service of Particulars a practical view from the Bar", "userID" : "2", "objUrl" : "http://dispute.practicallaw.com/cs/Satellite/4-518-7887?null", "pageType" : "", "contentAccessed" : "false", "analyticsPermCookie" : "256c544cf:13ed253eb13:-64f8", "analyticsSessionCookie" : "256c544cf:13ed253eb13:-64f7", "statisticSensorPath" : "http://analytics.practicallaw.com/sensor/statistic" }